Skip to content

Top 6 Reasons Why Data Loss Prevention(DLP) Implementation Fails

Top-6-Reasons Why Data Loss Prevention Implementation Fails

Below are Top 6 Reasons Why/ Data Leakage Prevention/Data Loss Prevention Fails:

  • Lack of business/key-stakeholders involvement:

    Failure to include key stakeholders (Including Business and C-level executives) while defining requirements and formulating DLP policy make implementation harder. A clear ‘Data Loss Prevention policy’ from the management and Board clearly sets up the expectations, allocate needful resources and comes up with a plan for its governance.

  • Ineffective data classification methods:

    Failure to identify the right data to be protected. Undermining certain data can lead to the exposure of sensitive information while the overwhelming amount of protected data can bring down the system and network performance. Conducting risk assessment on data, data owners, and data custodians is very crucial for the success of any DLP implementation.

  • Excessive False Positives:

    Overly strict rule-set, policies can lead to an overwhelming amount of false positives and reporting. This can drastically bring down employee productivity and result in unnecessary workload for the IT security team

  • Loosely Integrated Data Loss Prevention modules:

    A complete DLP implementation will have network protection modules, Host protection modules and storage modules tightly integrated and centrally managed. Loosely Integrated DLP modules will create a lot of management overhead and may lead to ineffective monitoring.

  • Failure in periodic monitoring of changes in organization IT Infrastructure, Business units, and processes:

    This can render previous DLP controls ineffective. The changes must be taken into account to fine-tune DLP modules from time to time for the DLP solution to deliver its value

Re-post of the blog, originally posted on CISO Platform

Link to original blog:

About FireCompass:

FireCompass is a SaaS platform for Continuous Automated Pen Testing, Red Teaming  and External Attack Surface Management (EASM). FireCompass continuously indexes and monitors the deep, dark and surface webs using nation-state grade reconnaissance techniques. The platform automatically discovers an organization’s digital attack surface and launches multi-stage safe attacks, mimicking a real attacker, to help identify breach and attack paths that are otherwise missed out by conventional tools.

Feel free to get in touch with us to get a better view of your attack surface.

Important Resources: